What Science Fiction is For

By

 Science fiction is cool...



Here is another link to the post about entopy.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Intro to Extralogical Reasoning Part 3: Understanding Self-Ignorance: A Primer for Understanding Yourself and a World you weren't Designed to Comprehend

By
A sentient being is a specimen that can contemplate its existence and plan for manifold futures. Humans easily qualify as sentient and, therefore, are called self-aware. The common, and rather questionable, implication of awareness here is UNDERSTANDING. In part 2, I showed that knowing and understanding are by no means necessarily the same. To go from awareness to understanding is a rather big jump. But given the nature of evolution, it’s easy to infer that self-awareness, or ANY form of awareness, couldn’t arise in such a process without a species being preprogrammed to vastly overestimate it; and if that species were designed for any degree of self or general UNDERSTANDING at all, it would only be in the very narrow sense as pertains to SURVIVAL in their evolutionary environment--and ONLY in their evolutionary environment.    The feeling or belief in understanding and rationality is often as important as the real thing, both on the group and individual levels. Con...
Read more

Diagnosing vs. Understanding: The Epistemology of Psychiatric Diagnostics as a Societal Phenomenon

By
There’s a difference between diagnosing people and understanding them. Many don’t know the difference. Often it seems the more one learns of the former, the less perspective they have on the latter.    KNOWING means knowing the facts; UNDERSTANDING means knowing how they fit together. Diagnosing is implicitly synonymous with understanding but actually means knowing how the facts fit a preconceived model in a highly inexact science. PSYCHOLOGICALLY, understanding is all that’s required. At best, diagnosing is a means to that end. Even PSYCHIATRICALLY, precise dialogistic specificity is rarely if ever necessary. Basic reasoning alone tells you diagnostics are catalysts for confusion and bias, increasing vulnerability to inconsistent beliefs and twisting the facts AWAY from each other.           That said, extralogical reasoning (ER), or at least its creator, does not wholesale “reject” psychiatric diagnoses, nor deny that there may be...
Read more

A Summary Intro to Extralogical Reasoning

By
The puzzle of life  ( POL ) is dynamic and can never truly be solved (the POL is from Bishko’s life engineering). A thinker contrives progressively better solutions as the puzzle continually changes. The external World is in a perpetual state of change, and improving one’s solutions results in additional changes. Extra logical reasoning (ER) is my solution to the POL. Since I posted my three-part intro (part 1 , part 2 , part 3 ) over eighteen months ago, ER has evolved along with its creator. That intro totals over thirty-six pages, and I felt a shorter and updated iteration, ten pages, was in order.      The POL is dynamic because life is a complex system: a system of numerous known, unknown, and unidentifiable variables undergoing complex interactions (l ink to complexity theory article ). Ecosystems, economies, and societies are other examples. It is not what I call a COMPLICATED system, like a sophisticated watch or automotive system, nor a chaotic system, a com...
Read more